Skip to main content

Frame narratives in "Their Eyes Were Watching God"

     In the first three chapters of Zora Neale Hurston's "Their Eyes Were Watching God," Hurston introduces two different frame narratives. The first frame narrative comes with Janie recounting her life to her friend Pheoby. The second comes from within Janie's life story, when she remembers a story from her grandmother's life. To call these "frame narratives" is a little bit unfeeling, because they are actually stories. This oral tradition adds. depth to the characters and the novel. 

    When the novel begins, Janie seems guarded and reluctant to talk about her life. We later learn that this is because she has been gone from town and has experienced a lot of hardship since, including losing a partner. However, her willingness to open up to Pheoby about her life and past shows the reader that their relationship is a lot deeper than their conversations would suggest. The reader also gets to learn more about Janie through her story, which helps to open up the narrative after the semi-confusing first chapter. 

    The second story, told by Janie's grandmother, has multiple purposes. The reader learns so much more about Janie's life, but they also learn about her grandmother's motivations. The pain of losing Janie's mother effects almost all of her grandmother's choices that surround Janie. Pairing Janie's story about womanhood and growing up with her grandmother's story about Janie's mother and experiences with assault ties the three woman together even more that their blood ties. 

    In the end, these stories serve to move the novel along and create depth for the characters. 






Comments

  1. The "layers" of frame narratives in Their Eyes Were Watching God definitely confused me at first, but your post does a great job of clarifying them! The stories seem to serve the purpose of adding dimension to the characters by depicting the far-reaching impacts of certain events on all 3 generations of women .

    ReplyDelete
  2. The grandmother at one point describes the story she tells Janie as a kind of "sermon" she's long wanted to deliver on behalf of women, making it a unique kind of frame narrative: she has a *lesson* she wants to impart to her granddaughter, and it has to do with raising her consciousness about gender and sexuality and the hazards of being a black woman in this world. Curiously, given how generally sympathetic and moving Nanny's framed narrative is, Janie largely hears it as so many reasons she needs to lower her expectations and accept a second-rate life. As we'll see, Nanny ultimately is "hated" by Janie, a foil who stands in the way of her chances for happiness and self-realization. But the history of sexual violence she relates--connecting two generations of this family to rape--is vital information to frame the whole novel. We'll hear a lot about Janie's hair and her other biracial features, and it's important to remember that Hurston is clear that these very features are the result of brutal historical circumstances and literally the products of rape.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In my mind I picture the narrator as an old black woman, or like an ageless god lady, so that adds another layer to the onion of black women telling a story, though in the narrator's case it isn't her story - or is it? Maybe she's an elderly Janie, telling a story about herself telling a story about her life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ageless god lady. love it.
      zora neale hurston = ageless god lady????

      But for real, I like the idea of a narrator defying realism. The narrator breaks into the frame narratives by transitioning Janie's speech to normal narration and possesses a fair degree of omniscience (e.g. speaking the thoughts of multiple characters), so some serious suspense of disbelief would have to happen if we were to consider the narrator to be a character or friend of a character in the novel.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Denver, "Beloved"

     After reading the ending of "Beloved," I wanted to think back more on the character of Denver, because she plays a large role in the final part of the book, but is more of a side character during the start and middle. To me, this was a very intentional choice by Morrison, because it contributes to the way that the reader sees Denver, and our understanding of her dynamic with both Sethe and Beloved.      When she is first introduced in the story, Denver in the only child of Sethe's remaining at 124 (at least, alive). Her connection to her mother and to Paul D is strained, as she struggles with understanding her place in the world. Her knowledge of Beloved, both as a ghost and as a woman, is not often mentioned, even though it's very important for the plot of the book and you'd think she would have told her mother about what was going on. I think this part was especially intentional, because a main theme of the book and for Denver specifically is the spe...

"Their Eyes Were Watching God" and "Invisible Man"

     While reading Their Eyes Were Watching God  for this class, I kept thinking about how different it was from the two previous books we read: Invisible Man  and Native Son.  The setting, narrative style, and general tone of Hurston's novel is entirely distinctive (and I really enjoyed reading the book because of that). Looking back, however, I find the echoes of Their Eyes Were Watching God  in Invisible Man  more and more. I'd like to discuss the similarities and differences in this blog post.      To start off, they are both frame narratives told by the main character of the story. That frame impacts how the reader sees the story in both books, but there are many differences in how the frame changes the narrative. In Invisible Man,  the narrator is clearly talking about the process of writing, which is connected closely to his character. This established him as the narrator, and we have referred to him as such throughout o...